Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow
Regardless of their political affiliation, people frequently become anxious when they ponder how the government’s alleged competing interests may affect important issues. Healthcare is no different in this regard. Some people believe that interests other than those that are beneficial to society can either aid or impede local, state, and federal policies and laws. Legislators are the providers of legislative benefits, and their main objective is to win re-election. Legislators must therefore increase their chances of being re-elected, which requires political backing. Lawmakers are seen to be logical and to weigh costs and benefits when confronted with requests for legislation. The costs and advantages to society of implementing certain legislation, however, are not taken into account in the cost-benefit analysis of the lawmaker. Instead, the advantages include the more political backing the politician would get by supporting the legislation and the political backlash they would suffer as a result of their decision. Legislators will support the legislation when it benefits them (gets good political support) more than it costs them (gets negative political support).
Many people do not see the Affordable Care Act (ACA) argument as a matter of electoral politics or vote to tally. Families are concerned about whether they will still have access to health insurance and be able to pay for their prescription drugs after the dust settles. It is important for healthcare professionals to be able to treat every patient in their community without feeling overburdened by the expense of uncompensated care. In addition to having the resources necessary to manage the opioid crisis and other public health issues, it is important for states to maintain jobs and companies. The Commonwealth Fund has spent nearly a century assessing plans and programs to see if they make it simpler for more Americans to access high-quality healthcare.
We can predict how proposed changes, like those in the Better Care Reconciliation Act (the Senate bill) and the American Health Care Act (the House bill), may affect people’s access to health care and state economies because of the work we have supported. The evidence on the consequences of these two bills is quite strong, even if the precise implications of any policy would vary greatly from state to state. To access a fact sheet with more details, click the state below.
The number of uninsured people would rise if the ACA were repealed and replaced with the BCRA:
The expected effects of ACA repeal on state budgets and the labor market in general serve to emphasize the importance of the healthcare industry to the US economy. The evidence serves as a reminder to assess any potential adjustments for possible unforeseen implications.
Other Commonwealth Fund research, such as our long-running biennial health insurance survey, demonstrates that Americans with Medicaid coverage are less likely than many Americans with private insurance to experience problems with cost-related healthcare access and benefit from greater financial protections.
Medicaid is tightly knit into the fabric of the American healthcare system, from covering the vast majority of births to covering the majority of long-term care provided at the end of life.
*Children’s Health Insurance Program and Medicaid Expand Coverage in States:
All of this research emphasizes how crucial it is to base any plan to reform American healthcare on factual data. It also demonstrates the need for suggested modifications to be created with everyone’s needs in mind from the outset.
Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of health legislation: An economic perspective (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
We’ll write everything from scratch
Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."