Militarization of U.S. Police

Over the past three decades, there has been a significant expansion in the militarization of policing in America, fundamentally altering an already unstable ethos in many law enforcement sectors. Due to this militarization, I researched the benefits and drawbacks of having a militarized police force for this week’s debate in our textbook and online.

Benefits of Police Militarization

The police can efficiently handle dangerous situations. Sometimes, military-grade equipment is needed to retake control of a dangerous situation quickly. Examples of such events include rioting and mass killings. When police officers are equipped with better weapons, they are more successful in handling hazardous situations.

Utilizing vehicles built by the military can lessen gunfire. Military-grade vehicles can lessen shooting despite their intimidating appearance. Police personnel are more secure in those vehicles than in other types. Since they are safer, they will not need to engage in gunfire with criminals, saving lives on both side

Problems with Police Militarization

Using a military mindset toward civilians is dangerous. The risk of putting a military mindset on civilians is one of the most serious negative effects of police militarization. The military sees the opposition as a danger that needs to be removed. Contrarily, citizens are those whose rights are protected by the US Constitution. They are not you.

The Standards of the Police Are Low. The low threshold for becoming a police officer is another problem with police militarization. Someone needs to be responsible and emotionally stable if they will supervise military-grade equipment. Some police officers misuse their positions of power and are unfit for duty.

As a result, there can be no positive interaction between the public and the government. The goal of the police department is to build strong relationships with the general people. They are tasked with looking out for and providing for the locals in their communities. Citizens’ fear of militarized police is understandable, especially when certain officers abuse that militarization. Too many locals have experienced fear due to the SWAT team entering their homes without warning or justification.

So, after balancing the benefits and drawbacks of police militarization, I have concluded that many behind bars are good people who made mistakes, were wrongfully detained, or were found guilty by association. Because of their military orientation, police officers occasionally use excessive force. Because of this, caution should be used while militarizing police forces. However, some police militarization is necessary because of the amount and type of crime in the United States.

Reference

Militarization of U.S. Police? [Video]

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Please respond to the following:

View the video, Militarization of U.S. Police? [Video]. In the past decade or so, we have seen what is known as the “militarization of police.” This means that police agencies have been given old military equipment such as armoured vehicles, uniforms, and the like to address violent situations better.

What are your thoughts on this? In your opinion, does the militarization of police better help police address violent situations? Or is it a threat to the public when they respond to protests and the like with this equipment? Why or why not?

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}