Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

LE 300J Park University Serial Killers Portrayed in The Media Essay

LE 300J Park University Serial Killers Portrayed in The Media Essay

Question Description

I’m working on a writing question and need guidance to help me learn.

Essay

Your first research essay should be a fully completed work of 5 pages. Your topic may be related to the development of any idea that has already been expressed as part of the course; your thesis should be a synthesis of carefully documented research and critical analysis of this topic. The essay should incorporate the general parts of an academic essay—an introduction and thesis, a body of specific evidence/support/analysis, and a conclusion that emphasizes the answers to questions you may have asked within your research.

Your writing should address the Core Learning Outcomes of the course and the Instructor Specific Learning Outcomes, as specified on the syllabus. I have included them here for your convenience:

  1. Analyze the disciplinary content in its own context and in relationship to the issues, questions, and positions of other disciplines.
  2. Compare and contrast differences and similarities among the disciplines in terms of central concerns, values, methodologies, and relationships to public life.
  3. Synthesize diverse perspectives to achieve an interdisciplinary understanding.
  4. Analyze the relationships among academic knowledge, professional work, and the responsibilities of local and global citizenship.
  5. Interpret and critique the possible “real world” connections or behaviors associated with the viewing or playing of media violence.

Instructor Learning Outcomes

  1. Identify, discuss and critique the representations of serial killers as heroes, celebrities, and icons in modern media forms. Explain the characteristics of the media forms, genres, and methods for each subject.
  2. Describe and analyze the popular culture forms that encourage audience identification or participation through violence or vicarious experience.
  3. Evaluate multiple perspectives, modes of inquiry and expression, and processes for decision-making in the disciplines.

Specifics

Your essay should conform to the MLA format for citations within the text and in your works cited. Therefore, your writing should be double-spaced, with one-inch margins, in a 10-12-pitch font. The grading of this essay will be based upon the objective skills we have focused upon in our course lectures and discussions—incorporating your research sources seamlessly within your own writing, building upon your skills as a “close-reading” expert and analysis of your topic, and answering the larger questions about “why” we are studying serial killers as heroes (as well as, “why” your topic is popular? important? significant? worthy of study? definitive of its audience?)

Resources

You should carefully construct your essay by looking at the examples we have studied within our course—the popular culture essays that have been part of your reading assignments, our in-class examples, and the writing process that has been investigated in our class assignments (Discussion Postings, etc).

MLA

APA (Links to an external site.)

Rubric

LE 300: Integrative and Interdisciplinary Learning Capstone

LE 300: Integrative and Interdisciplinary Learning Capstone

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 1: Insightful QuestioningRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Asks meaningful questions that show an understanding of the need for an interdisciplinary approach to solving a complex problem. Competent (Second Milestone): Asks questions about complex problems that show an attempt to understand and solve the problem from a single disciplinary perspective. Developing (First Milestone): Asks surface-level questions about complex problems. Beginning (Benchmark): Acknowledges that problems are complex without being able to pose surface-level questions about them. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 2: Gathering information from multiple disciplinesRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Assembles intentionally focused, relevant information from multiple reputable sources (or using disciplinary methods) from multiple disciplines. Competent (Second Milestone): Assembles relevant information from multiple, different reputable disciplinary sources or using disciplinary methods. Developing (First Milestone): Assembles tangentially related information from sources or methods from different disciplines. Beginning (Benchmark): Finds disconnected information from sources or methods without acknowledgement of their disciplinary origin or reputability. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 3: Analysis of patterns and connections from disciplinesRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Organizes and synthesizes evidence from multiple disciplines to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to the problem the student is analyzing. Competent (Second Milestone): Organizes evidence from one or more disciplines to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to the problem the student is analyzing. Developing (First Milestone): Organizes evidence from at least one discipline, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities. Beginning (Benchmark): Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 4: Synthesizing Disciplinary PerspectivesRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Independently creates holistic understandings or frameworks out of multiple parts (synthesizes) or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. Competent (Second Milestone): Independently compares, contrasts, and connects examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. Developing (First Milestone): When prompted, compares and contrasts examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. Beginning (Benchmark): When prompted, presents examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 5: TransferRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Makes explicit references to previous learning in general education or major and applies that knowledge and those skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in novel situations in a new and creative way. Competent (Second Milestone): Makes references to previous learning in general education or major and shows evidence of applying that knowledge and those skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in novel situations. Developing (First Milestone): Makes references to previous learning in general education or major and attempts to apply that knowledge and those skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in novel situations. Beginning (Benchmark): Makes vague references to previous learning in general education or major but does not apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension and performance in novel situations. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLE Integrative 6: Interdisciplinary CollaborationRubric Description: Accomplished (Capstone): Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals generated by the team from an interdisciplinary perspective. Competent (Second Milestone): Offers alternative solutions or courses of action from student’s discipline (or an interdisciplinary perspective) that build on the ideas of others. Developing (First Milestone): Offers new suggestions from the student’s discipline to advance the work of the group. Beginning (Benchmark): Shares ideas but does not advance the work of the group. Not Applicable: Not applicable to this assignment.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsAccomplished (Capstone)

3 ptsCompetent (Second Milestone)

2 ptsDeveloping (First Milestone)

1 ptsBeginning (Benchmark)

0 ptsNot Applicable

Total Points: 0

PreviousNext


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.